Hello, i have ported OpenWrt for the NanoPi R2S. Networking perfomance is better than FriendlyWrt and openssl benchmarks are too good. https://github.com/jayanta525/openwrt-nanopi-r2s
benchmark numbers posted by testers, i don't have the r2s board.
WIP [ not ready for PR yet]
I am currently preparing for PR at openwrt and uboot.
Test builds here: https://github.com/jayanta525/jayantaji ... nwrt/forum, please test the build and let me know if there are any issues.
NanoPi boards are seems perfect for openwrt, i have already created a PR for NanoPi R1, and i will keep up the work to add support to NanoPi ZeroPi, Core2 and others board at openwrt. If you own any NanoPi board and needs to port openwrt to it, reply here.
Thanks.
Code: Select all
OpenSSL 1.1.1g 21 Apr 2020
built on: Wed May 20 21:35:46 2020 U,64) rc4(char) des(int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(ptr)
compiler: aarch64-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc -fPIC -pthread -Wa,--noexecstack -Wall -O3 -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -Wno-error=unused-result -O3 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -znow -zrelro -DOPENSSL_USE_NODELETE -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DKECCAK1600_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DPOLY1305_ASM -DZLIB -DZLIB_SHARED -DNDEBUG -DOPENSSL_PREFER_CHACHA_OVER_GCM
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
aes-128-cbc 125389.79k 380230.29k 742168.83k 1011209.90k 1130659.84k 1138862.76k
benchmark numbers posted by testers, i don't have the r2s board.
WIP [ not ready for PR yet]
I am currently preparing for PR at openwrt and uboot.
Test builds here: https://github.com/jayanta525/jayantaji ... nwrt/forum, please test the build and let me know if there are any issues.
NanoPi boards are seems perfect for openwrt, i have already created a PR for NanoPi R1, and i will keep up the work to add support to NanoPi ZeroPi, Core2 and others board at openwrt. If you own any NanoPi board and needs to port openwrt to it, reply here.
Thanks.