Hi,
One could compare the T6 and the M6 in similar conditions (same network, with monitor active, keyboard attached and nvme). I would use "sudo lspci -vvv" or similar to check if aspm L1 is active for the nvme and "cat /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy" to check if it is set to "powersave" for both, since powersaving is a big issue for me.
When using the nvme in powersave mode an RK3588S/M6-system would use around 3W in idle (with a margin for attached devices). When compared to the RK3588/T6 does it consume about the same? Or would the pcie2x1 on the M6 account for at least 1W less consumption than the T6?
Or formulated differently: If I want an efficient system with RK3588(S) and nvme should I choose the T6 or the M6?
One could compare the T6 and the M6 in similar conditions (same network, with monitor active, keyboard attached and nvme). I would use "sudo lspci -vvv" or similar to check if aspm L1 is active for the nvme and "cat /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy" to check if it is set to "powersave" for both, since powersaving is a big issue for me.
When using the nvme in powersave mode an RK3588S/M6-system would use around 3W in idle (with a margin for attached devices). When compared to the RK3588/T6 does it consume about the same? Or would the pcie2x1 on the M6 account for at least 1W less consumption than the T6?
Or formulated differently: If I want an efficient system with RK3588(S) and nvme should I choose the T6 or the M6?